Food Timeline>Colonial America & 17th/18th century France


balloon pictureHave questions? Ask!
Colonial & early American fare

What did the colonists eat? The answer depended upon where they came from and where they landed. The Spaniards settling in St. Augustine ate differently from the English people in Jamestown, the Dutch in New York, and the French who migrated to Canada. Settlers brought their recipes, cooking methods and some supplies with them. They also used local foods introduced by the Native Americans. Some European recipes adapted well to these new ingredients. Meal times were different, too.

Plimoth Colony
What's for dinner in the 17th century? Thanksgiving fare

Connecticut

New Jersey
general notes & Recipes from Cape May

New York
New Netherlands Dutch fare

North Carolina
Native American food in North Carolina

Pennsylvania

Virginia: Jamestown Settlement
Hariot's Report
Foods of Jamestown
Life at Jamestown

Virginia: Colonial Williamsburg
General foodways
African-American foodways

Colonial South Carolina
Rise of the Georgetown Rice Culture

Colonial Pennsylvania/Philadelphia
According to William Woys Weaver (foremost expert in Philadelphia's culinary history) colonial Philadephia was a melting pot of tastes and cuisines. English, French and West Indian influences prevailed. The art of confectionery (including ice cream) was considered the best in America. Taverns abounded, as did local markets and imported supplies. If you want to learn more about Philadelphia's culinary contributions we heartily recommend The Larder Invaded: Reflections on Three Centuries of Philadelphia Food and Drink, Mary Anne Hines, Gordon Marshall and William Woys Weaver (1986 exhibition catalog and recipes), Historical Society of Pennsylvania. Your librarian can help you obtain a copies, you can purchase them directly from the Historical Society.

History books confirm Philadelphia's City Tavern was "THE PLACE" for the signers of our Declaration of Independence. This establishment continues to serve traditional 18th century fare. If you want recreate some of these recipes ask your librarian to help you find the City Tavern Cook Book/Walter Staib. We also recommend:

Foods From the Founding Fathers/Helen Newbury Burke
Thirteen Colonies Cookbook/Mary Donovan, et al.

[1832] Seventy-Five Receipts for Pastry, Cakes and Sweetmeats, Eliza Leslie

Of course...there were other cuisines. Period Quaker traditions are best captured by Penn Family Recipes: Cooking Recipes of Willian Penn's Wife Gulielma/edited by Evelyn Abraham Benson [George Shumway:York PA] 1966

BREAKFAST, LUNCH AND DINNER?
Colonial meal structures/times were also different from what we know today. Breakfast was taken early if you were poor, later if you were rich. There was no meal called lunch. Dinner was the mid-day meal. For most people in the 18th century it was considered the main (biggest) meal of the day. Supper was the evening meal. It was usually a light repast. It is important to keep in mind there is no such thing as a "typical colonial meal." The Royal Governor of Virginia ate quite differently from the first Pilgrim settlers and the West Indians laboring in Philadelphia's cookshops.

If you need a basic overview on what was served for colonial meals, this information will help:

"Breakfast. The Colonial American breakfast was far from the juice, eggs and bacon of today. The stoic early settlers rose early and went straight to the chores that demanded their attention. In frontier outposts and on farms, families drank cider or beer and gulped down a bowl of porridge that had been cooking slowly all night over the embers...In the towns, the usual mug of alcoholic beverage consumed upon rising was followed by cornmeal mush and molasses with more cider or beer. By the nineteenth century, breakfast was served as late a 9 or 10 o'clock. Here might be found coffee, tea or chocolate, wafers, muffins, toasts, and a butter dish and knife...The southern poor ate cold turkey washed down with ever-present cider. The size of breakfasts grew in direct proportion to growth of wealth. Breads, cold meats and, especially in the Northeast, fruit pies and pasties joined the breakfast menus. Families in the Middle Colonies added special items such as scrapple (cornmeal and headcheese) and dutch sweetcakes wich were fried in deep fat. It was among the Southern planters that breakfast became a leisurely and delightful meal, though it was not served until early chores were attended to and orders for the day given...Breads were eaten at all times of the day but particularly at breakfast."
---A Cooking Legacy, Virginia T. Elverson and Mary Ann McLanahan [Walker & Company:New York] 1975 (p. 14)

"Dinner. Early afternoon was the appointed hour for dinner in Colonial America. Throughout the seventeenth century and well into the eighteenth century it was served in the "hall" or "common room." ..While dinner among the affluent merchants in the North took place shortly after noon, the Southern planters enjoyed their dinner as late as bubbling stews were carried into the fields to feed the slaves and laborers...In the early settlements, poor families ate from trenchers filled from a common stew pot, with a bowl of coars salt the only table adornment. The earliest trenchers in America, as in the Middle Ages, were probably made from slabs of stale bread which were either eaten with the meal or thrown after use to the domestic animals. The stews often included pork, sweet corn and cabbage, or other vegetables and roots which were available...A typical comfortably fixed family in the late 1700s probably served two courses for dinner. The first course included several meats plus meat puddings and/or deep meat pies containing fruits and spices, pancakes and fritters, and the ever-present side dishes of sauces, pickles and catsups...Soups seem to have been served before of in conjunction with the first course. Desserts appeared with the second course. An assortment of fresh, cooked, or dried fruits, custards, tarts and sweetmeats was usually available. "Sallats," (salads) though more popular at supper, sometimes were served at dinner and occasionally provided decoration in the center of the table...Cakes were of many varieties: pound, gingerbread, spice and cheese."
---A Cooking Legacy (p. 24-28)

"Supper. What is there to say about a meal that probably did not even exist for many settlers during the eary days of the Colonies and later seemed more like a bedtime snack made up of leftovers?...In the eighteenth century supper was a brief meal and, especially in the South, light and late. It generally consisted of leftovers from dinner, or of gruel (a mixture made from boiling water with oats, "Indian," (corn meal) or some other meal). One Massachusetts diary of 1797 describes roast potatoes, prepared with salt but no butter. Ale, cider, or some variety of beer was always served. In the richer merchant society and in Southern plantation life, eggs and egg dishes were special delicacies and were prepared as side dishes at either dinner or supper...Supper took on added importance as the nineteeth century wore on. This heretofore casual meal became more important as dinner was served earlier in the day."
---A Cooking Legacy (p. 79-81)
[NOTE: This book as far more information than can be paraphrased. Ask your librarian to help you find a copy.]

We also recommend Hung, Strung, & Potted: A History of Eating Habits in Colonial America, Sally Smith Booth.

Notes on foodways and class from Colonial Williamsburg.
Thomas Jefferson's breakfast and dinner
History of breakfast (general) Dessert pyramids

AUTHENTIC SOURCES & COOKING INSTRUCTIONS
Food historians generally agree Amelia Simmons American Cookery, published in Hartford CT, 1796 is the first "American" coobook. Why? It was the first cookbook to include indigenous ingredients, most notably corn meal. The first cookbook printed in the American Colonies was E. Smith's The Compleat Housewife published by William Parks, Williamsburg VA, 1742. Like most of the other cookbooks used in colonial America it was a reprint of a European cooking texts. colonists used cookbooks published in their native countries. English cooks would have had books written by Hannah Glasse, John Farley, John Murrell, and E. Smith. If you want authentic texts start here:

NEED TO PLAN A COLONIAL MEAL?
There are three kinds of colonial/early American fare: the real thing (hearth cookery, original/fresh ingredients), modernized recipes adapted for today's kitchens (grocery store ingredients cooked in your kitchen), and contemporary interpretations served in fine 18th century-style eating establishments (Philadelphia's City Tavern, Colonial Williamsburg, et al.).

Preparing a colonial meal is a very doable project. Where to begin? Think about:

How was the cooking done?

  • Colonial Virginia Cookery, Jane Carson
    ---excellent introduction to (and explanation of) colonial recipes and cooking methods.
  • The Virginia House-Wife, Mary Randolph, with historical notes and commentaries by Karen Hess [University of South Carolina Press:Columbia] 1984. This repinted 1824 cookbook from provides authentic recipes. Ms. Hess' notes provide valuable insight into the ingredients and cooking methods employed at that time.
  • Pleasures of Colonial Cooking, New Jersey Historical Society
  • Hung, Strung, & Potted, Sally Smith Booth, "Cooking in the Home."

    MODERN ADAPTATIONS
    Planning a Colonial Day? Food ideas & sample menus!

    If you need something simple to make for class we suggest:

    "CONTEMPORARY" 18TH CENTURY FARE
    The art of reconciling authentic colonial fare with contemporary tastes is a complicated task. Understandably, few chefs choose to undertake this particular challenge. Those who have (and have done it well) are to be commended for their historic dedication, personal insight, and professional creativity. This is no mean feat. "A [real] taste of history" (even if the food is made in contemporary kitchens with modern ingredients) introduces modern diners to meals of times past. History notes and anecdotes enhance the experience. Some exemplary restaurants:

    RECOMMENDED READING:

    Salem, 1690

    The recipes used by cooks in Salem, MA in the 1690s were based primarily on popular English cookbooks of the day: Robert May's Accomplisht Cook [1685] and Gervase Markham's English Huswife [1615]. Soups, stews, fresh roasts, preserved meats (bacon, ham, salt pork) salads, breads/biscuits, puddings/pies (sweet and savory), cakes/cookies were all common items. Fruits and vegetables were served fresh or preserved (dried, pickled).

    The ingredients used by Salem cooks in the 1690s would have been a combination of "new world" foods (corn, clams, squash, beans, cranberries, potatoes), local fare (mollusks, fish, wild game, fowl/birds, domesticated hogs, apples, nuts, berries, onions, cheese, eggs) and imported goods (tea, coffee, sugar, rum, citrus fruits, spices & flavorings etc.)

    General notes on colonial American fare

    What was known as Salem Village in the 17th century is now known as Danvers, MA.

    1. You will find a brief overview of the food eaten at this time/in this place and a few sample recipes in this book: Recipes from America's Restored Villages, Jean Anderson (pages 11-20) The Pioneers' Village and Salem, Massachusetts. These pages contain general food notes and recipes for chicken pie (original & modernized), lamb carbonnade, and Salem suet pudding. It also references a book published in 1910 by the Esther C. Mack Industrial School entitled What Salem Dames Cooked, which is described as containing popular local recipes from the 17th-18th centuries.

    2. Check the food information uploaded by Plimoth Plantation (same basic period and too not far from Salem). Modernized recipes are included.

    Pilgrim Thanksgiving dinner.

    3. If you have time to identify and access primary sources the Salem 1630 Pioneer Village is probably the best source for your project. They do not have food information on their Web site. You can contact info@7gables.org

    You can also contact these organizations:

    WANT TO MAKE A SALEM 1690 COOKBOOK?
    Food historians tell us the first colonial/American cookbooks were not published until the late 18th century. 17th century Salem, MA/Puritan cooks would have been using (if they used at all) English cookbooks. The recipes would have been quite similar to what was prepared and eaten during Shakespeare's time.

    These cookbooks were either printed and leather-bound (if you were rich) or handwritten manuscripts (these traditional wedding gifts passed on family recipes). The first New England cooks often substituted local ingredients (such as cornmeal, squash, cranberries) for ingredients listed in their English cook books. This was because some of the ingredients were non-existant or very expesive. Wheat flour and apples are two examples. If you want to be totally accurate, don't print these "new world" foods in your cookbook---enter them as handwritten notes.

    Can I see some old cookbooks to learn which recipes were included and how they were worded?
    Yes! Several 17th and 18th century cookbooks have been uploaded to the Internet. The best are scanned so you can also appreciate the graphic layout and typesetting. Some excellent samples here:

    Colonial wedding feast

    According to the history books colonial wedding feasts were fabulous affairs, often lasting two or more days, depending upon family wealth & custom. Most colonial weddings & wedding feasts were held at home. Families served their guests the most expensive foods in the largest quantity in the best manner they could afford--not unlike today!. Church weddings, restaurant/hall/club receptions & *traditional* wedding cakes (the multi-tiered white on white cake we now eat) are Victorian customs.

    Colonial and early 19th century American cookbooks do not contain suggested menus for wedding receptions. The most you will find is an occasional recipe for wedding (or bride's) cake. What we know about food served at colonial wedding feasts comes mainly from diaries and other primary accounts. Consider this:

    "A Three-day Wedding Feast
    In Stonington, Connecticut, in 1726, Temperance Tealleys was wed to the Reverend William Worthington from Saybrook. Because of the large number of guests expected, a two-day celebration was planned. Elaborate advance preparations commenced for the feast. Chairs, tables, dishes, and utensils were borrowed from the neighbors. Folloing the marriage ceremony...tankards of spiced hard [alcoholic] cider were passed...The main course was family-style and consisted of fish or clam chowder, stewed oysters, roasted pig, venison, duck, potatoes, baked rye bread, Indian cornbread and probably pumpkin casserole. A dessert of Indian pudding studded with dried plums and served with a sauce made from West Indian molasses, butter, and vinegar followed. And they did have coffee. The tablecloths were removed and trays of nutmeats and broken blocks of candy made from maple sugar, butter, and hickory nuts...Outside the front door stood a gigantic punch bowl, hollowed out from a boulder, filled with hard cider combined with West Indian products such as sugar, lemons, and limes...After the dignitaries and most honored guests were served on the first day, and after the bride and groom left on horseback for Saybrook, there was a second day of feasting for the second-rated guests. The third day of feasting was a surprise, for some friendly Mohawks and Pequot Indians appeared...and more chowder and roast pig were served to them. (Information courtesy of the Stonington Historical Society.)"
    ---The Thirteen Colonies Cookbook, Mary Donovan [Praeger:New York] 1975 (p. 69)

    Before you can recreate an authentic colonial wedding feast you need to decide a few things:

    1. Where is your wedding?--Charleston? Williamsburg? Baltimore? Boston?
    ---people in different colonies had different culinary traditions/favourite foods
    2. How rich is the bride's family? Wealthy merchant? Subsistence farmer?
    ---people traditionally spent as much as they could for weddings, just as they do now
    3. What season is it?--fall was popular wedding time in agrarian societies (after the harvest)
    ---fresh fruit/vegetables had short life-spans in pre-electric days

    One of the the best sources for leaning about colonial-era foods The Virginia House-Wife, Mary Randolph, with historical notes and commentaries by Karen Hess [University of South Carolina Press:Columbia] 1984. This repinted 1824 cookbook from provides authentic recipes. Ms. Hess' notes provide valuable insight into the ingredients and cooking methods employed at that time.

    There are plenty of books that will help you recreate colonial recipes in your own kitchen. Ask your librarian to help you find these:

    If you can't get to the books you can use the colonial/early American recipes linked from the Food Timeline .

    About colonial wedding cake:
    Wedding cakes served in America from Colonial times to the mid-19th century were thick, rich spice cakes that included alcohol, dried fruit and nuts. They were more like Christmas fruitcakes than the light, fluffy cakes we are now used to. If you plan to make one of these PLEASE! Two things. First, omit the alcohol. Second, ask your teacher about the nuts. Some people are very allergic to nuts. If there is any question about using nuts, DON'T add them. Colonial cooks constantly adapted recipes to suit their guests, so you will be following in their spirit.

    Also, be forewarned...most of these recipes are intended to serve large numbers of people and are somewhat vague about cooking instructions. You might want to ask your school's cafeteria supervisor for help on the practical side (cooking terms, baking instructions). If you only plan to serve your class, consider cutting the recipe to 25%.

    "Wedding cake
    1 1/2 pounds butter
    1 1/2 pounds sugar
    8 eggs
    1 1/2 pounds flour
    1 tablespoon ground mace
    2 nutmegs
    1 cup black molasses
    1 cup coffee
    1 tablespoon rose extract
    2 pounds raisins
    3 pounds currants
    1 pound chopped almonds
    1 pound citron, cut fine

    Prepare the fruit and nuts, and dredge with part of the flour. Cream the butter and sugar together and add the well-beaten eggs. Mix and sift the flour and spices and add to the egg mixture. Add the fruit and liquids by degrees. Line a large baking pan with wax paper, greasing the pan well and then greasing the paper. Turn in the cake mixture and bake in a preheated slow over (250 degrees) for about 3 hours. Frost with white boiled icing. Makes about 12 pounds of cake."
    ---Foods From Our Founding Fathers, Helen Newbury Burke, (p. 238)

    Boiled icing is usually a simple concoction of water and confectioner's sugar. Thickness depends upon your proportions. You can also make the icing this way:
    3 egg whites
    1 cup powdered granulated sugar (not superfine)
    Beat egg whites. Add sugar, beating until smooth and white. Spread icing over slightly warm cake. It will harden very slowly.

    Looking for some original recipes? Here are some wedding cakes (sometimes called rich cake) from historic cookbooks:

    [1747]
    "To Make a Rich Cake

    Take four Pound of Flower well dried and sifted, seven Pound of Currants washed and rubb'd, six Pound of the best fresh Butter, two Pound of Jordan Almonds blanched, and beaten with Orange Flower Water and Sack till they are fine, then take four Pound of Eggs, put half the Whites away, three Pound of double refin'd Sugar beaten and sifted, a quarter of an Ounce of Mace, the same of Cloves and Cinnamon, three large Nutmegs, all beaten fine, a little Ginger, half a Pint of Sack, half a Pint of right French Brandy, Sweetmeats to your liking, they must be Orange, Lemon, and Citron. Work your Butter to a Cream with your Hands before any of your Ingredients are in, then put in your Sugar, mix it well together; let your Eggs be well beat, and strain'd thro' a Sieve, work in your Almonds first, then put in your Eggs, beat them all together till they look white and thick, then put in your Sack and Brandy and Spices, and shake your Flour in by Degrees, and when your Oven is ready, put in your Currants and Sweetmeats as you put it in your hoop; it will take four Hours baking in a quick Oven, you must keep it beaten with your Hand all the while you are mixing of it, and when your Currants are well wash'd and clean'd, let them be kept before the Fire, so that they may go warm into your Cake. This Quantity will bake best in two Hoops."

    [1747]
    "To Ice a great Cake another Way

    Take two Pound double refin'd Sugar, beat and sift it very fine, and likewise beat and sift a little Starch and mix with it, then beat six Whites of Eggs to Froth, and put to it some Gum-Water, the Gum must be steep'd in Orange-flower-water, then mix and beat all these together two Hours, and put it on your Cake; when it is baked, set it in the Oven again to harden a quarter of an Hour, take great Care it is not discolour'd. When it is drawn, ice it over the Top and Sides, take two Pound of double refin'd Sugar beat and sifted, and the Whites of three Eggs beat to a Froth, with three or four Spoonfuls of Orange-flower-water, and three Grains of Musk and Ambergrease together; put all these in a Stone Mortar, and beat these till it is a white as Snow, and with a Brush or Bundle of Feathers, spread it all over the Cake, and put it in the Oven to dry; but take Care the Oven does not discolour it. When it is cold paper it, and it will keep good five or six Weeks."
    ---The Art of Cookery Made Plain and Easy, Hannah Glasse, London [1747] (p. 138)
    [Note...Many colonial women cooked from European cookbooks until the American printing trade began to flourish.]

    [1772]
    "A Rich Cake

    Take six pounds of the best fresh butter, work it to a cream with your hands; then throw in by degrees three pounds of double refined sugar well beat and sifted; Mix them well together; then work in three pounds of blanched almonds, and having them altogether till they are thick and look white. The add half a pint of French brandy, half a pint of sack, a small quantity of ginger, about two ounces of mace, cloves, and cinnamon each, and three large nutmegs all beaten in a mortar as fine as possible. Then shake in gradually four pounds of well dried and sifted flour; and when the oven is well prepared, and a thin hoop to bake it in, stir into this mixture (as you put it into the hoop) seven pounds of currants clean washed and rubbed, and such a quantity of candied orange, lemon, and citron in equal proportions, as shall be thought convenient. The oven must be quick, and the cake at least will take four hours to bake; Or you may make two or more cakes out of these ingredients, you must beat it with your hands, and the currants must be dried before the fire, and put into the cake warm."
    ---The Frugal Colonial Housewife, Susannah Carter [1772] (p. 102)

    [1792]
    "Bride Cake

    Take four pounds of fine flour well dried, four pounds of fresh butter, two pounds of loaf sugar, a quarter of an ounce of mace, the same of nutmegs well beat and sifted, and to every pound of flour put eight eggs, four pounds of currants well washed and picked, and dry them before the fire till they are plump, blanch a pound of Jordan almonds, and cut them lengthways very thin, a pound of candied citron, the same of candied orange, and the same of candied lemon peel, cut in thin slips, and half a pint of brandy; first work your butter to a fine cream with your hand, then beat in your sugar a quarter of an hour, and beat the whites of your eggs to a strong froth, and mix them with your sugar and butter; beat your yolks for half an hour with one hand, and mix them well with the rest; then by degrees put in your flour, mace, and nutmeg, and keep beating it till your oven is ready; put in the brandy, currants, and almonds lightly: tie three sheets of paper round the bottom of your hoop to keep it from running out, and rub it well with butter, then put in your cake, and lay your sweetmeats in three layers, with some cake between every layer; as soon as it is risen and coloured, cover it with paper before your oven in closed up, and bake it three hours. You may ice it or not, as you choose, directions being given for icing in the beginning of this chapter."
    ---The New Art of Cookery According to the Present Practice, Richard Briggs [W. Spotswood, R. Campbell & B. Johnson:Philadelphia] 1792 (p. 465)

    "Icing for Cakes.--Take the whites of twelve eggs, and a cound of couble-refined sugar pounded and sifted through a fine sieve, mix them together in a deep earthen pan and beat it well for three hours with a strong wooden spoon till it looks white and thick, and with a thin paste knife spread it all over the top and sides of your cake, and ornament it with sweet nonpareils, or fruit paste, or sugar images, and put it in a cool oven to harden for one hour, or set it at the distance from the fire, and keep turning it till it is hard. You may perfume the icing with any sort of perfume you please."
    ---ibid (p. 457)

    Now, all you have to think about is the proper table setting...rich families could afford fine European linen, porcelain dishes & silver; middle/lower class families often did their best with American-made cotton products, local pottery and pewter. Ask your classmates for assistance. Just like the colonial wedding described in colonial Connecticut, this can be a community event. Plates, etc. don't have to match. If you have a budget, your local party supply store probably stocks inexpensive items that will serve the purpose.

    Colonial American Tavern Fare

    We know a great deal about what was consumed in colonial American taverns, public houses, and ordinaries. Information comes from a variety of sources including proprietor records, expense accounts, and travel diaries. Prices were fixed by law. Meals varied greatly according to location, season, and availability. Then, as today, establishments based in urban centers offered a greater variety of foods and dining options. Our founding fathers conspired, conscripted, and celebrated America's independence in taverns throughout the colonies. General notes here:

    "The meals and services offered in a public house naturally varied...Travelers expected food and liquor on the road to be mediocre, the choices limited, and prices haphazard. They were characteristically delighted when a public house's entertainment exceeded their expectations. Samuel Vaughan listed in 1787 the types of food (all commonly found in the cupboards of 18th-century rural communities) available to travelers on the last page of his travel diary: Ham, bacon & fowl pigeon of one sort or another always to be had upon the road & often fresh meat or fish, dried Venison Indian or Wheaten bread, butter eggs milk, often cheese, drinks Rum, Brandy or Whiskey, resembling Gin.'...

    "In the cities...tavern proprieters competed with one another for customers, advertising the merits of their housees in the newspapers...Dr. Alexander Hamilton, while traveling from Annapolis to Boston...might have satisfied himself on the road with bread, cheese, and cold apple pie for a meal but would have expected more substantial and better fare in the cities; he recorded a good dinner at Todd's Tavern in New York City, which consisted of veal, beefsteak, green peas, and raspberries...

    "The foods served in Thomas Allen's tavern demonstrates the variety of foodstuffs available in agrarian America; the types of foods used, the kinds of dishes prepared and served at the City Coffee House and other taverns in urbanized areas did not vary significantly from what might have been found in a private home. Between January 9 and March 16, 1774, Allen purchased locally, and subsequently served to his customers, beef once, veal seven times, fowl and turkey five times, mutton twice, and lobsters, salmon, eels, oysters, duck, and other fish caughtin nearby Long Island Sound at least once. He kept stores of gammons (smoked ham or bacon), smoked and pickled tongue and beef, salt pork, crackers, butter, coffee, apples, and sugar on hand. Meat, heavily salted for preservation, was the mainstay of the 18th-century diet...In addition, Allen regulary served bread and a potpourri of vegetables: potatoes, carrots, peas, beans, beets, onions, cabbages, turnips, squashes, and cucumbers for pickling. He bought several types of English cheeses and imported lemons and limes for punch. In 1790 Allen ordered four tin plates "to Bake Gingerbread"...

    "The dining habits ascribed by Moreau de St. Mery to Philadephians in the 1790s give an idea of how the meals at the City Coffee House in New London (and other taverns) might have been served: They breakfasted at nine o'clock on ham or salt fish, herring, for example, which accompanied by coffee or tea, and slices of toasted or untoasted bread spread with butter. At about two o'clock they dine without soup. Their dinner consists of broth, with a main shich of an English roast surrounded by potatoes. Following that are boiled green peas, on which they put butter which the heat melts, or a spicy sauce, then baked or fried eggs, boiled or fired fish, salad which may be thinly sliced cabbage seasoned to each man's taste on his own plate, pastries, sweets to which they are excessively partial and which are insufficently cooked. For dessert they have a little fruit, some cheese and a pudding.' Tavern meals were simply prepared...Cooking facilities were limited, many kitchens contained only an open hearth...broiling and boiling were the most popular food preparation methods...

    "Eighteenth-century entertainment took place in the tavern rather than the home. Diaries describe private parties, business and political meetings, celebratory banquets, and gatherings of male friends held in city taverns...City taverns, as the 18th century progressed, became accustomed to supplying large and elegant repasts;...a Charleston tavern keeper advertised that he could prepare a dinner of up to 40 dishes. An element of formality was injected into these private gatherings; the dishes were served and arranged on the table in order, and specific beverages accompanied them...Tavern keepers, like some early American housewives, apparently followed the dictates of English cooks like E. Smith....Elizabeth Raffald and Richard Briggs; all of whome included bills of fare and table diagrams for the placing of each course in their books...A Philadelphia family's "elegant entertainment" for 24 in 1786 began with turtle soup, then boned turkey, roast ducks, veal and beef, followed by two kinds of jellies and various kinds of puddings, pies, and preserves; and then almonds, raisins, nuts, apples and oranges'...Despite the formal arrangement of the table settings, the dishes themselves remained simple...It was customary to take small amounts of each dish...rather than large portions...The volume of liquor consumed usually far outweighed the food. When the City of New York paid the City Tavern for 28 dinners in 1798...[the tavern] was also reimbursed for 30 bottles of madiera...6 bottles of English porter, punch, brandy, bitters...

    "In the city tavern, private dining areas were established. Complaints surfaced about dining and intermingling with ordinary citizens...Even a small public house like Allen's City Coffee House in New London included a modest private dining room...Edward Myston, manager of the City tavern in Philadelphia, advertised in 1793..."Private Dinners any day, or every day, for members of Congress, or parties of private Gentlemen, will be set on the table at any hour."...

    "In the 18th century, drinking was the most popular of all tavern recreations...The kind of drink offered by an individual tavern was a factor in its location, the availability of supplies, and the economic status and aspirations of its tavern keeper. Drinking habits did not differ significantly from colony to colony, wehre the majority of the inhabitants were British...Rum was the most popular distilled liquor of the time...Punch was a combination of then luxurious ingredients. The drink was made using the rinds and juice of imported lemons, limes, and even oranges, commonly mixed with rum, and white or brown sugar...Lime punch was the most popular version of the drink...punch was served warm and sold in taverns by the bowl...Toddy--rum mixed with sugar and water--and sangre--a mixture of wine or beer sweetened with sugar and flavored with nutmeg--were also dispensed by the bowl...Wine, imported from Spain and Germany, was also served in taverns, but was not widely available outside the cities...Madeira, served during the meal, was the most expensive and popular wine. The consumption of wine, like punch, was limited to the more affluent. Many colonials drank cheaper, fermented beverages made locally. Cider (hard cider) was sold by the jug...Beer was either imported from England or locally brewed...Brandy was usually imported, but native varieties were sold, made from peaches, apples, or cherries. Homemade liquors gained popularity during the Revolution when the importation of alcohol, beer, and wine was halted."
    ---Early American Taverns: For the Entertainment of Friends and Strangers, Kym S. Rice for Fraunces Tavern Museum [Regnery Gateway:Chicago] 1983 (p. 85-96)

    "French emigre Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin...spent two years in New York (1794-96)...He later recalled the hospitality of American taverns...dinner consisted of roast beef, turkey, vegetables, salad, fruit tart, cheese, and nuts, all accompanied by copious quantities of claret, Port, adn Madeira, followed by rum, brandy, and whiskey...The availabiltiy of meat and game exemplified America's bounty, so that venison, pigeon, turkey, ducks, bear and other game were not unusual in a large tavern, both in the country and in the city." Pork was the principal meat, beef not as easy to come by. Vegetables were not much eaten in those days, and shellfish was preferred to fish...Most of the food served at taverns, especially in the country, bore little resemblance to the kind of fancy cookery Sam Fraunces featured. Yet few ever complained about the huge portions offered at even the most remote inn, and a breakfast of several eggs, game birds, pancakes, and coffee or tea was ubiquitous throughout America...By far the msot common dish served to travelers was ham, and, in the South, chickens...it was improbable that the average traveler in the colonial era would have much enjoyed whatever it was he was eating. Culinary excellence my have been held in high esteem at some homes or in the finer city taverns after 1750, but most inns and taverns served food of a very low, if stomach-filling order. Some communities set minimal standards for food service, even distinguishing between a "good meal" and a "common one." Meals were served at a set time and fixed price (often included in the price of the room) to the public...The food had a numbing sameness to it, depending upon the location of the tavern, it would stick pretty colse to what was most readily available...Many customers couldn't have cared less about hte food; they came for news, good talk, and companionship."
    ---America Eats Out, John Mariani [William Morrow:New York] 1991 (p. 18-21)

    What did our founding fathers eat for dinner on July 4, 1776?

    According to the history books, Philadelphia's City Tavern was "THE PLACE" for the signers of our Declaration of Independence. Unfortunately, the Tavern's communications staff confirms the original bill of fare was not preserved in tavern records or primary accounts. If you want to serve something similar, City Tavern's cookbooks and online menus provide excellent guidance.

    Tavern notes

    Recommended reading:

    How much did these meals cost?


    17th & 18th century France

    Louis XIV & Modern French Cuisine


    Louis XIV (1638-1715) encouraged and enjoyed the "new invention" of classic French cuisine. This food movement differed from Medieval/Renaissance cooking in that it stressed the natural flavors of foods rather than intense spices and sugars. Classic French cuisine was championed by chefs such as Pierre Francois de la Varenne. His book, Le Cuisiner Francois (published in 1651), is still regarded as a turning point in culinary history. This was also the period of "New World" food introductions. Among the the most significant? Potatoes and tomatoes (These were not, however, assimilated until the next century).
    Salads of all sorts were also very popular, as as were a battery of new sauces, which would define classic French cuisine.

    "In the reign of Louis XIV, cooking was spectacular rather than fine or delicate, and the festivities of the Prince of Conde at Chantilly, for example, were particularly sumptious. The famous Vatel was maitre d'hotel of Conde the Great, a very important position! A great number of dishes were served at each meal and there are many descriptions of the meals served at the table of Louis XIV, who ate too heavily for a true gourmet. The Palatine Princess wrote: "I have very often seen the king eat four plates of different soups, an entire pheasant, a partridge, a large plateful of salad, mutton cut up in its juice with garlic, two good pieces of ham, a plateful of cakes and fruits and jams.' However, Louis XIV established the habit of having dishes served separately. Before this time, everything was piled up together in a large pyramid. In his reign, the culinary utensils of the Middle Ages were replaced by a batterie de cuisine, which included many new pots and pans in tinplate and wrought iron, and, later, the introduction of silver utensils. Louis XIV had a passion for vegetables, which led La Quintinie to develp gardening: green peas were produced in March and strawberries in April. Oysters and lamb were particularly highly prized, and elaborate dishes were concocted. One sauce became famous: bechamel, named after the financier Louis de Bechameil, who drafted recipes and precepts in verse. Coffee, tea and chocolate were favoured by the aristocracy, and doctors debated about their advantages and drawbacks. Establishments were set up specializing in these exotic drinks. For example, in 1680 the cafe Procope opened in Paris. Here, fruit juices, ices and sorbets, exotic wines, hippocras, oregat pastes, crystallized (candied) fruits and fruits preserved in brandy were sold. In addition to the coffee houses, taverns, inns and cafes had multiplied in the city and were visited frequently by princes and their courtiers."
    ---Larousse Gastronomique, Completely revised and updated [Clarkson Potter:New York] 2001 (p. 519)

    "The decisive change in French cooking did not become apparent until the middle of the seventeenth century, although the new cuisine codified by Pierre Francois de la Varenne in Le cuisinier francois (1651) had been evolving for some time before that...La Varenne, squire of the kitchen to the Marquis d'Uxelles, seems to have been unable to abandon the court tradition completely, but the atmosphere of Le cuisinier francois suggests that his heart was not in it. The old recipes were there, but the new ones, harbingers of what is now thought as the classic French cuisine, were sharply contrasted. La Varenne began his book with a recipe for stock-in which most cookery writers have followed him ever since-gave sixty recipes for the formerly humble egg...treated vegetables as food in their own right, made much use of the globe artichoke and very little of spices, and recommended simple sauces based on meat juices and sharpened with vinegar, lemon juice, or verjuice..."
    ---Food in History, Reay Tannahill [Three Rivers Press:New York] 1988 (p. 237-8)

    "Common European cooking traditions endured until the seventeenth century, when national cuisines began to develop. It was only when French cookery became culturally stylized and was used to mark social differences that it also became a model for the courtly and aristocratic cuisines of Europe. This concious cultural creation of cookery and table manners shows itself most clearly in the fact that before the seventeenth century, cookbooks and recipe collections were rarely published. Then, suddenly, in the seventeeth and eighteenth centuries, many cookbooks appeared. The first of this series was Cusinier Francois, by Francois Pierre de la Varenne, published again and again from 1651 until 1738....In the seventeeth and eighteenth centuries...the haute cuisine served to express courtly aristocratic lifestyles. Only cooking and eating that demonstrated wealth, luxury, and pomp could accomplish this goal and distinguish the aristocracy in no uncertain terms from the rising middle class..."
    ---"The Dominance of the French Grande Cuisine," The Cambridge World History of Food, Kenneth F. Kiple & Kriemhild Conee Ornelas, Volume Two [Cambridge University Press:Cambridge] 2000 (p. 1210-1216) [includes extensive bibliography]

    "The age of Louis XIV! The teachings of Olivier de Serres now bore fruit. Gastronomical customs and culinary recipes appeared in new forms that were very close to our own of today. Food supplies contined to increase. Market-gardens and kitchen-gardens under cultivation flourished. Vinyards produced the finest wine: people were now able to drink it without flavoring it. Good food became an art. More and more cookbooks appeared...M. de Bonnefons had an entre almost everywhere, among the great as well as those of lesser importance. He had a keen eye and his book is full of instructive information. In the chapter on arranging a formal dinner we read, for instance: "The great fashion is to place four fine soups at the four corners of the table with four dish stands between each two, with four salt cellars placed near the soup tureen. On the dish stands are placed four entrees, in low pie dishes, Guests' plates should be deep so that they can use them for the soup or for helping themselves to whatever they wish to eat without taking it spoonful by spoonful out of the serving dish as they might be disgusted at the sight of a spoon which had been in the mouth of a person, being dipped into the serving dish without being wiped. The second course will consist of four substantial dishes set in the corners, either a court-bouillon, a pice of beef or a large roast, and salad on the plates. The third course will consist of roast poultry and game, small roasts and all the rest. The middle of the table is left free as otherwise the head steward will have difficulty in reaching across it, because of its great size. If desired, fill the centre of the table with melons, various salads in bowls or on little plates to make serving them easier, oranges and lemons. Preserves in syrup on marzipan biscuits could also be put there."...The Sun King was a glutton. He ate without discernment, and he ate enourmously. He would think nothing of four huge plates of different kinds of soup, a whole pheasant, a partridge, vegetables, a large dish of salad, two big slices of ham, mutton with garlic, a plate of cakes and --to wind up a good meal--eggs prepared in various ways. Thanks to the Sun King, oysters regained the popularity they had lost since the days of the Romans...Families no longer ate in their bedrooms or in the halls of their dwellings. Every respectable household now boasted a dining room...The national dish was the pot-a-oie--it was to remain popular right up to the Revolution. The recipe is simple: take an enormous goose and stuff it with various meats, especially feathered game...Place a few aromatic herbs inside the poultry as well. Put it in the oven to roast. The most refined person ate only the stuffing; they left the goose for the servants...Coffee apperaed in France under Louis XIV. The king drank it for the first time in 1644...From coffee to cafes was but a step. In 1672, an Armenian at the Saint-Germain fair opened the first shop where one could sample coffee...The man made a fortune."
    ---An Illustrated History of French Cuisine, Christian Guy, translated by Elisabeth Abbott [Bramhall House:New York] 1962 (p.63-66)

    Royal Tables/Versailles

    "The King's Meat...Three hundred and twenty-four people were exclusively employed on preparing the toothless monarch's food. This army was lodged in the Grand Commun, now the Hopital Militaire. At meal-times, the beat', that is to say, all the dishes shown on the menu, was borne in solemn procession, led by the First Maitre d'Hotel, himself accompanied by thirty-six serving gentlemen and twelve Masters bearing as a sign of seniority a silver-gilt baton, from the kitchens across the road into the palace, through a maze of galleries and corridors and finally to the King's table which was usually laid in his bedroom. Louis XIV generally ate alone, except when away from Versailles, he seldom if ever entertained another man and only admitted his family to his board on rare occasions when the Princes of the Blood wore their hats and he remained bareheaded, no doubt in order to convey that he was the host and at home, whereas th others were no more than transient guests. On rising, for his breakfast he took only a bouillon or a cup of sage tea, so that by the ten o'clock meal his appetite was keen and the matter serious; the following meal was prepared for one person.

    Soups
    Of the two old capons, four partridges with cabbage, six pigeons for a bisque, one of cocks' crests and beatilles

    Hors D'Oeuvre
    One of capons, partridges

    Entrees
    A quarter of veal with the rump, the whole of a 28 lb. 12 pigeons for pie

    Small Entrees
    Six fricasseed chickens, two minced partridges, three young partridges in gravy, six ember cooked pies, two young grilled turkeys, three fat chickens with truffles

    Roasts
    Two fat capons, 9 chickens, 9 pigeons, 2 petendeaux, 6 partridges, 4 tarts

    Desserts
    Two bowls of fruit, 2 of dried preserves, 4 of stewed fruit, or liquid hams.

    ...The roast was also flanked by two small dishes; one of capon, two snipe and two teal, and the other consisting of five partridges. The hors d'oeuvre are not mentioned, but they were not tiny dainties by solid stuff: sausage, white boudin, truffled pasties and warmed up beef in gravy. However, during Lent, the King rested and allowed his royal stomach to benefit by abstinence. It much however be noted that a totally meatless meal, for fear that he might be too debilitated on fast-days, usually began with a soup made of capon, 4 lb. Beef, 4 leb. Veal and 4 lb. Mutton. This purely hygienic precaution taken, abstinence began: a carp, a hundred crayfish, a milk soup, a herb soup, two turtle soups, a sole, a large pike, four medium soles, two perch, a sole, a hundred oysters, six sting-fish, and as a roast half a salmon and six soles...And for supper: two foot-long carp, two soups, a pike a foot and a half long, three perch, three soles, a trout a foot and a half long, half a large salmon, a large carp. All the King had then to do was retire to bed, but for fear of his collpasing from night starvation a tiny snack was put at his door...a bottle of water, three loaves and two bottles of wine."
    ---Gastronomy of France, Raymond Oliver, translated from the French by Claude Durrell [Wine and Food Society:Cleveland OH] 1967 (p. 315-7)

    Recommended reading:

    Primary sources
    The French Cook, Francois Pierre La Varenne, Englished by I.D.G. 1653, introduced by Philip and Mary Hyman [Southover Press:East Sussex] 2001 ---introduction to the book, biographical sketch of La Varenne, and translated recipes

    DISHES & FLATWARE
    French porcelain in the 18th century
    French silver in the 17th and 18th centuries Spoon and fork (picture, closeup)

    ABOUT 17TH CENTURY FRENCH SALADS
    The Sun King likely had several kinds of salads on his table. Popular salads of the day included mixed greens (lettuce, cress, chickory, purslane) with vinaigarette (vinegar, oil, salt & spices), pickled vegetable salads (cucumbers, asparagus, etc.), composed salads (chopped greens and salted meats), boiled salads (warm vegetables dressed in vinegar/spices), and fruit salads (lemon, pomergranite "dressed" in sugar).

    Food historians tell us salads (generally defined as mixed greens with dressing) were enjoyed by ancient Romans and Greeks. As time progressed, salads became more complicated. Recipes varied according to place and time. Dinner salads, as we know them today, were popular with Renaissance diners throughout Europe. Pickled salads (cucumbers, cabbage, etc. packed in vinegar, salt, & spices) and boiled salads were also regularly consumed by 16th and 17th century European diners. The 17th century marks the genesis of the classic French Cuisine (La Varenne, Massialot, etc.). One of the key concepts of this new cuisine was the perfection of the relationship between acid and salt. This taste combination was reflected in the sauces (including salad dressings) of the day. Louis XIV was said to have been fond of food in great excess. Presumably, his menu featured many salads in grand quantities.

    Sample period recipe:

    "Minor Herbs of All Kinds for Salads--a recipe of Niclas de Bonneons, 1654:
    Tarragon, saxifrage, garden cress, watercress, lamb's lettuce, pimpernel-all these and a thousand others, flowers as well as herbs, are useful in making salads to be served with oil or sugar. And, as a rule, the greater the diversity of ingredients in these salads, the more enjoyable they are. Pimpernel is also useful when placed in one's wine glass, for it gives its taste and fragrance to the winde. And the bud of the elder, when used in a salad, serves to relax the stomach."
    ---The Grand Masters of French Cuisine: Five Centuries of Great Cooking, Celine Vence and Robert Courtine [G. Putnam's Sons:New York] 1978 (p. 260)

    "In the mid-seventeenth century La Varenne, like the Italians, continued to recommend salad platters, including salt meats, which he suggested should be kept on hand. He gave instructions for half-salt or marinated fish and chicken and directions for preserving lettuce, artichokes, cucumbers, purslane, aparagus, chickory, and cabbage. Salt products are prominent in his composed dishes. The melted anchovy, or garum, makes its debut, linking La Varenne closely with Apicius. In contrast to the Italians, he gave no salt meat any prominence in composed dishes. The mid-seventeenth French twist on Roman food is the caper, which now makes its appearance in dishes of every sort."
    ---Acquired Taste: The French Origins of Modern Cooking, T. Sarah Peterson [Cornell University Press:Ithaca] 1994 (p. 152)

    "The French took the salad--that is, food seasoned with salt and acid--as the framwork of theri new, stimulating cuisine. They derived the notion of extending the salad throughout the meal--that is, of making the salt-acid taste a kind of umbrella--from the ancients and the Renaissance Italians, both whom had served salads at various points throughout their banquets...The French idea of engulfing the meal in the salad came principally from [the] Italian practice of making salads of various kinds available throughout dinner. In their radical revision of food, the French took the idea of the salad and reshaped the whole meal up to the sweet course so that it would stimulate the appetitie. Every dish was to become saladlike, whether it was called a salad or not...Salt coupled with acid became the signature of many a sauce, just as it had become the stamp of salad. The acid might be vinegar, wine, verjuice (juice of unripe fruit), lemon, or orange (or much later the tomato)...Of the two crucial parts of a salad, the French gave the palm to salt. The touch of acid was important, but not so critical as salt."
    ---ibid (p. 185-6)

    Sallets/Dr. Alice Ross
    About vinaigrette ("French" dressing)

    Need to make something for class? We suggest pumpkin pie!


    Louis XV

    Louis XV of France reigned from 1723-1774. His reign bridged the brilliant opulence of his predecessor to the disastrous excesses of his successor. The culinary offerings of Louis VX reflected this period of change.

    "The reign of Louis XV was no less happy for gastronomy. Eighteen years of peace healed painlessly the wounds made by more than sixty years of war; wealth created by industry, and either spread out by commerce or acquired by its tradesmen, made former financial inequalities disappear, and the spirit of convivality invaded every class of society. It is during this period that there was generally established more orderliness in the meals, more cleanliness and elegance, and those various refinements of service which, having increased steadily until our own time, threaten now to overstep all limits and lead us to the point of ridicule."
    ---The Physiology of Taste, Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin, originally published in Paris 1825, translated by M.F.K. Fisher [Counterpoint:Washington DC] 1999 (p. 298-9)

    Sample menu, circa 1740, for ten persons, provided by Brillat-Savarin

    1st course: the bouilli (meat and its broth); an entree of veal cooked in its own juice; an hors d'oeuvre.
    2nd course: a turkey; a plate of vegetables; a salad; a creamy pudding (sometimes).
    Dessert: some cheese; some fruit; a jar of preserves.
    Plates wer exchanged only three tiems, after the soup, at the second course, and for dessert. Coffee was very rarely served, but quite often there was a cordial made from cherries or garden pink, still something of a novelty then."
    ---ibid (p. 298-9)

    "...let us consider courses which have varied in number at different periods, rising to a maximum under Louis XIV and Louis XV when there were eight coruses of eight dishes each...In a ceremonial meal tow ouf to the eight courses consisted of entremets and two of desserts. There would be a soup course consisting of several soups, a fish course of several fishes, and entree course, a roast course and a game course. Rather surprisingly, the compositon of the courses could be optiona, the entremets mainly consisted of vegetables, and the entrees (poultry or classical) could appear in the same course as the fish, shellfish, roasts or game." ---Gastronomy of France, Raymond Oliver, translated from the French by Claude Durrell [World Publishing Company:Cleveland OH] 1967(p. 207-7)

    Supper eaten by Louis XV at the Chateau on 29 September 1755
    [NOTE: "supper" was a meal taken late in the evening, not the main meal of the day.]

    The Soups
    Two oilles: One of large onions, One a l'espagnole
    Two potages: One de sante, One of turnip puree
    The Entrees
    Small pies a la balaquine, Rabbit fillets a la genevoise, Filet mignon of mutton with sauce piquant, Fillets of pheasant en matelote, Quails with bay leaves, Turtle doves a la vinitienne, Partridges a l'ancient salmy, Small garnished pigeons, Blanquette of fowls with truffles, Marinade of campines, Fowl wings en hatelets, Leg of veal glazed with its own juice, Minced game a la turque, Sweetbreads Ste. Menehould, Rouen ducklings with orange, Halicot with dark veloute sauce.
    Four Releves
    Roast mutton of Choisy, Rump of beef a l'ecarlate, Sirloin, the fillet minced with chicory, Caux fowls with raw onion
    Four Main Entremets
    Pheasant pie, Jambon de perdrouillet, Brioche, Croquante
    Two Medium Entremets--Roasts
    Small chickens, Campines, Ortolans, Thrushes, Guignards, Red-leg partridges, Pheasants, Rouen duckling
    Sixteen Small Entremets
    A coffee cream, Artichokes a la galigoure, Cardoons a l'essence, Cauliflower with Parmesan, Eggs with partridge gravy, Truffles a la cendre, Spinach with gravy, Cocks' crests, Animelles, Green beans with verjuice, Ham omelette, Turkey legs a la duxelles, Mixed ragout, Chocolate profiterolles, Small jalousies, Creme a la genest." ---ibid (p. 297-300)

    Need modernized recipes??!
    Ask your librarian to help you find The Grand Masters of French Cuisine: Five Centuries of Great Cooking, Celine Vence and Robert Courtine. Here you will find dishes from La Chapelle [1733], Marin [1739], Cuisinier Gascon [1740], Menon [1746], Dictonnaire Portatif [1765], and Buc'hoz [1771].


    French Revolution foods

    The years immediately preceding the French Revolution were a time of great excess and terrible poverty. Royalty feasted on rich confections and huge roasts; the starving peasants ate anything they could find, including stale bread and scraps. In 18th century France, new world foods, most notably potatoes, played a pivotal role in feeding the starving country.

    The Revolution was a great culinary equalizer. The fall of the Royal regime created (by necessity) a more egalitarian cuisine. Food, and the concept of how it was eaten changed radically. During the revolution another notable French "invention" happened. The restaurant. The first restaurants were quite different from what we know today. Their initial purpose was to serve healthy restoratifs (soup!) to anybody who could pay.

    "The eighteenth century was a great century for cooking, but the progress made and the refinements added to the art of cooking were briefly interrupted by the French Revolution. In 1789 the French Revolution broke out, and according to one observer at the time, it "served the soverign people a dish of lentils, seasoned with nothing but the love of their country, which did very little to improve their blandness." The interest in cooking and gastronomy was temporarily interrupted, but when things had calmed down enough in 1795, a little book entitled La Cuisiniere Republicaine was published. It was written by a Mme. Merigot, who gives recipes for potatoes (unnacceptable until then as a food by the French.)"
    ---The Grand Masters of French Cuisine: Five Centuries of Great Cooking, Celine Vence and Robert Courtine [G.P. Putnam:New York] 1978 (p. 55)
    [NOTE: This books has much more information/recipes than can be paraphrased here. Ask your librarian to help you find this book.

    The bread question

    "Let them eat cake," Marie Antoinette allegedly pronounced. What was this cake and why is this phrase so important? Parisians were indeed starving in the years preceding the French Revolution. Bread, while commonly employed for its symbolic connection as the "staff of life," was not the only commodity in short supply. There were several reasons for these food shortages, number one being a population explosion. Other key factors included war (farmers pressed into service meant neglected fields, weather conditions (severe drought), and economics (inadequate distribution systems).

    "A shortage of bread has been suggested as the cause of the fall of Rome, the French Revolution, and the Russian Revolution of 1917."
    ---The Story of Bread, Ronald Sheppard and Edward Newton [Charles T. Branford:Boston MA] 1957 (p. 58)

    "Bread was the staple food of the masses and it was poverty which caused the [French Revolution] rebellion. The more naive than caustic comments of Marie Antoinette, 'Let them eat cake,' was explosive in an already tense atmosphere. What the people wanted was bread, with all its symbolic implications."
    ---Gastronomy of France, Raymond Oliver, translated from the French by Claude Durrell [Wolrd Publishing Co.:Cleveland OH] 1967 (p. 107-108)

    "'The people was all roaring out Voila le boulanger et la boulangere et let petit mitron, saing that now they should have bread as they now had got the baker and his wife and boy.' The year was 1789, the place Paris, the 'baker' Louis XVI and the 'bakers wife', Marie Antoinette. The French Revolution had not...been sparked off by hunger or high prices, and Marie Antoineette's relentlessy mistranslated remark that if there was not dread, the people whould eat 'cake' was no more than one of those minor but eminently quotable political gaffes that their perpetrators are never allowed to forget. Bread shortages had always been a fact of Parisian life, productive of nothing more serious than an occasional riot. It was only after the middle classes made the first breach in the defences of the privileged elite that the ordinary people of France began to take a hand in the game. While the Constitutent Assembly discussed the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the abolition of aristocratic privileges, the market women of Paris took the opportunitiy of demonstrating their disapproval of the fact that, after a series of disastrious harvests, a four-pound loaf now cost 14 1/2 sous. The effective daily wage of a builder's labourer at the time was 18 sous. Throughout the 1790s far more serious food crises and riots were to bedevil the plans of the revolutionaries and their successors--and to sound a warning to the governments of other countries confronted with the problem of expanding towns and an unprecedented increase in population. The problem was more one of distribution than production since agricultural developments were taking place that promised to make shortages a thing of the past."
    ---Food in History, Reay Tannahill [Three Rivers Press:New York] 1988 (p. 283)

    "...in France...there was a new investment by the state in solving problems of food distribution that had previously been the responsibility of individual cities...French monarchs int eh eighteetnh century became increasingly concerned with the possibility of popular uprisings due to bread shortages. To forestall that possibiltiy, they stocked wheat and promulgated new laws governing the sale of grain. Both responses appear to have improved the situation, but not everyone agreeed that this was the case. In The Bakers of Paris and the Bread Question, 1700-1775, Steven Kaplan has shown that when merchants followed the king's orders to stockpile grain, their actions were often interpreted as attempts to corner the market in order to drive up prices. Large-scale wheat purchases did in fact raise prices on local markets and force some people to go hungry, and critics saw this as evidence of a "famine conspiracy." Furthermore, laws promoting free trade in grain, which ultimately stimulated new cereal production, had to be withdrawn or modified on several accasions in the face of vehement protests by various groups: the best known of these episodes was the "flour war" of 1775...Was the French government right to intervene in teh food distribution system rather tahn lieave it, as in the past and as in some other coutnries, in the hands of municipal governments and private interests? It would have been difficult to have acted differently: whereas popular protest in the seventeenth century had been directed mainly against taxes, int eh eighteenth century it was directed maily against shortages of bread. Although these disturbances were not as severe as in previous centuries, they could not be neglected. Thus the bread question became the paramount political issue of the day, just as wheat came to dominate agriculture and the popular diet...Antoine Parmentier, suggested making bread with flour from potatoes, which could be grown in fallow fields between grain harvests and with helds tow to three times greater than that for wheat. But in many parts of Europe people did not yet feel miserable enough to accept such fare, which was considreed fit only for hogs, eveni if it could be turned into bread."
    ---Food: A Culinary History, Jean-Louis Flandrin & Massimo Montanari [Columbia University Press:New York] 1999 (p. 354-355)

    "In the months before the storming of the Bastille the people of Paris commenced once more to greet each other with the forbidden greeting of the Jacquerie: "Le pain se leve..." What bread? There was none...most Frenchmen believed that the lack of grain was due to a conspiracy...There is no doubt that the grain speculators were making a great deal of money at the time...The unique factor was the mass delusion that the purpose of their speculation as to "exterminate the French nation."..It was said that Louis XV had already earned ten millions pounds as a result of this murderous conspiracy. The society was alleged to be buying cheaply all the grain in France, secretly exporting it, buying it again from abroad, and importing it back to France at tenfold the original price...The fact was that all export of grain from France had been prohibited for the past hundred years...Revolt was...raging in the provinces...The Bastille had been stormed--but the people of Paris did not yet have their bread...In fact, in the days after the storming of the Bastille there was an unusual shortage of flour. The people could not feed on the glory of the Revolution. Why did a four-pound bread still cost 12 1/2 sous and a white bread 14 1/2? The government provided subsidies so that the bakers would lower their price. But this did not increase the supply of bread. The angy populace lost precious hours waiting in front of the bakeries. To be sure, Parmentier's potato bread was much cheaper. But who was interested in Parmentier and his bakers' college? That was...nonsense. Parmentier's experiments--it was unjustly said--were donducted only so that the rich could cram something into the mouths of the poor. Let him eat his potates himself. "We want bread!" the people shouted...[in] August 1789...a drought had come upon France worse than any the nation remembered. The streams dried up. The result was that the mills could not run. There were windmills only in the provinces of northern France. In central and southern France all milling was done in water mills. Now the little grain there was could not be ground! The Minister of Agriculture at once ordered the erection of horse-driven mills. But this took time. In September the supply of bread in Paris dwindled away again, and the price rose shamelessly. The seething masses became convinced that the Court still had bread...In the early morning of October 5, 1789, Paris spewed her torrents of human beings out into the misty roads. They marched with pikes and scythes, barefood and in rags...The masses were obsessed with hallucinations. "Did you see the bread wagons?" "Yes, bread wagons on the horizon!"...King Louis XVI had turned off the water in the park--it was needed to run the mill. Because the water no long splashed in the fountains, the villages around Versialles had bread--though there was not enough for Paris. All at once it occurred to the marchers that perhaps the king himself had not much bread...The women's cries from bread died down...When they returned, there was general disappointment. Paris had though it would now begin to rain bread...but...Louis XVI could not conjure up bread...Fourteen hungry days passed..."Watch out for the bakers" became the watchword. "The bakers have hidden flour. They want to wait until we can pay more."...Both the National Assembly and the administrators knew that whether th nation were kingdom or republic, the people would hang all authorities who did not solve the bread problem. But the bread problem could not be solved. The National Assembly set aside 400,000 pounds for agricultural aid, but this still not solve the problem...Where was the bread? The flow of grain dwindled to a trickle, as it had when the despots reigned, and the bakers' ovens remained empty...Grain had to be procured--but how? Trade was unpopular...Traders must be speculators, therefore cheats...At great cost the city of Paris bought grain abroad...What monsters there were among the people; such individuals as those who on August 7, 1793, spirited away 7,5000 pounds of bread out of starving Paris becasue they hoped to obtain higher prices in the provinces...All the guilty men were executed...In Ocober 1793 Paris once more received flour...The Commune of Paris decreed that from then on only a single type of bread could be baked in the city--the pain d'egalite. The flour sievs of millers and bakers were confiscated, for they were a symbol of fine berads. All, poor and rich, would have bread of equally poor quality... On Decmber 2, 1793, the bread card was introduced; and eighteen months later the Commune decided upon free distribution of bread: one and a half pounds daily to workers and the heads of families, one pound to all others. Before long all there was of bread were the cards. In 1794 the harvest was pitifully small...Men killed one another for bread...France saw no bread until peace came. The Revolution had not been able to produce it, and the war made it impossible to distrubute it. It was until the period of the Directory, from 1796 on, that the soldiers were furloughed; they returned to the fields which now no longer belonged to landowners but to themselves and their families, and they began to till these fields. Such was the role of bread in the French Revolution."
    ---Six Thousand Years of Bread, H.E. Jacob [Lyons Press:New York] 1997 (p. 246-254)

    "For a time, food prices rose dramatically; crops planted by farmers, who were then drafted into the Republic's armies, went unharvested...Attempting to impose fraternal solidarity by means of food distribution programs, more than one revolutionary demanded that bakers stop preparing their typical range of breadstuffs and combine brown, white, and rye flours together to make one single "Bread of Equality." In the capital, in Feburary 1792, shortages led to the outbreak of popular street protests, but, as William Sewell has noted, the men and owmen of Paris were rioting not for bread, the totemic staff of life, but for sugar, soap, and candles. Sewell's point is particualrly well take, for the radical revolutionary rhetoric of "subsistence" has long led historians to believe that the danger of famine was the driving force behind many of the National Convnention's economic policies. True, the Convention passed "the Maximum" in September 1793, putting it in effect a broad series of...price-fixing regulations... Tet these "necessities" included not only bread and wine, but cheeses, butter, honey, and sausages as well..."Subsistence" was certainly at the heart of much revolutionary rhetoric; but revolutions do not subsist on bread alone."
    ---The Invention of the Restaurant, Rebecca L. Spang [Harvard University Press:Cambridge MA] 2000 (p. 106-107)

    Noble food
    The 17th century marked the genesis of classic French Cuisine. Food historians tell us the nobles of this period followed this new trend, supporting the chefs and their ideas wll into the 18th century. By the 18th century, the noble and wealthy classes were dining in the manner of "Grand Cuisine." Multi-course meals and elaborate service were the hallmarks of this style. Notable chefs/cookbook authors included Massialot, La Chappelle, Marin, and Menon.

    "Louis XVI did not inherit Louis XV's delicate taste in food. Like the Sun King, he was a glutton...During their reign Louis and Marie-Antoinette dined every Sunday in public. But the queen only pretended to eat...She dined afterwards in her apartments, among her intimates."
    ---An Illustrated History of French Cuisine, Christian Guy [Bramhall House:New York] 196 (p. 86)

    Supper given...for Marie Antoinette
    ...menu of this supper from the imperial archives quoted by L'Almanach des Gourmands pour 1862, by Charles Monselet. Her Majesty's Dinner, Thursday 24 July 1788 at Trianon:

    Four Soups
    Rice soup, Scheiber, Croutons with lettuce, Croutons unis pour Madame
    Two Main Entrees
    Rump of beef with cabbage, Loin of veal on the spit
    Sixteen Entrees
    Spanish pates, Grilled mutton cutlets, Rabbits on the skewer, Fowl wings a la marechale, Turkey giblets in consomme, Larded breats of mutton with chicory, Fried turkey a la ravigote, Sweetbreads en papillot, Calves' heads sauce pointue, Chickens a la tartare, Spitted sucking pig, Caux fowl with consomme, Rouen duckling with orange, Fowl fillets en casserole with rice, Cold chicken, Chicken blanquette with cucumber
    Four Hors D'Oeuvre
    Fillets of rabbit, Breast of veal on the spit, Shin of veal in consomme, Cold turkey
    Six dishes of roasts
    Chickens, Capon fried with eggs and breadcrumbs, Leveret, Young turkey, Partridges, Rabbit
    Sixteen small entremets
    (menu stops here)

    ---Gastronomy of France, Raymond Oliver, translated from the French by Claude Durrell [Wine and Food Society:Cleveland OH] 1967 (p. 300-1)

    Middle class food

    "The difference that existed, up to the end of the seventeenth century, between ordinary, everyday bourgeois cooking and aristocratic cooking was a difference in quantity and in elaborateness of presentation. Beginning in about 1750, the cuisine of ordinary days and that of special occasions were separated by a difference in kind, quality, and method. Ordinary cuisine naturally remained closer to old-style cuisine, for reasons of cost and convenience. According to Brillat-Savarin who, who had gathered his information from the inhabitants of several departments, a dinner for ten persons around the year 1740 was composed of the following:

    First service...boiled meat
    an entree of veal cooked in its own juice;
    an hors-d'oeuvre.

    Second service...a turkey;
    a vegetable dish;
    a salad;
    a cream (sometimes)

    Dessert...cheese;
    fruit
    A pot of jam

    This order, with the succession of the boiled and roasted as its prinicpal distinguising characteristic, was to remain practically the same in private homes down to the end of the nineteenth century. In Zola, it is the typical bourgeois menu."
    ---Culture and Cuisine: A Journey Through the History of Food, Jean-Francois Revel [Doubleday:Garden City NY] 1982, English translation (p. 193-4)

    Peasant food
    Daily meals for the "average" person consisted of bread, pottage (gruel from ground beans or soup with vegetables and perhaps a little meat), fruit, berries & nuts (in season) and wine. If you need to make/take something to class to signify this particular period in French history we suggest basic a loaf of French bread and a simple dish of potatoes. These would have been foods consumed daily by most of the people at that time.

    Here is a recipe...with historic notes...for "Pommes de Terre a L'Econome," Cuisinier Republicaine 1795:

    "Although potatoes could have been grown in France earlier, it was not until the French Revolution in 1789 that this precious vegetable was accepted by the French. The French accepted it only because famine, and the economic exigencies of the Revolution, forced it on them. The potato had long been considered poisonous in France, but once the French tried it and survived, they showed a surprising amount of enthusiasm for this "new" food. The following recipe is taken from one of the first postrevolutionary French cookbooks and is one of the earliest French recipes using potatoes.

    Pommes de terre a l'econome
    Ingredients: (for 4 servings): 3 sprigs parsley, finely chopped. 1 scallion, finely chopped. 4 shallots, peeled and finely chopped. 2 cupps chopped cooked meat (leftover meat or poultry). 2 pounds potatoes. 3 1/2 tablespoons butter. 1 egg. 1 egg, separated. Salt. Pepper. Flour. Oil for frying. Chopped parsley (to garnish).

    The Herbs and the Meat: Mix the finely chopped parsely, scallion, and shallots with the chopped meat. The Potatoes: Boil the potatoes in their jackets (skins) for thirty minutes in lightly salted water. Peel while still hot; then mash with a fork. The Patties: Combine the mashed potatoes and the chopped ingredients. Add the butter, egg, and egg yolk. Salt and pepper to taste. Shape into medium patties. (If they are too small, they will be too crunchy, and if too large, the centers will not cook thoroughly.) Beat the egg white until it begins to stiffen. Dip the patties into the egg white; then roll them in flour. Cooking the Patties: Place the patties in a frying pan with very hot oil. Turn so that they will brown on all sides. To Serve: Drain well, and serve garnished with parsley."
    ---The Grand Masters of French Cuisine: Five Centuries of Great Cooking, Celine Vence and Robert Courtine [G.P. Putnam:New York] 1978 (p. 253)

    AFTER THE REVOLUTION

    "In July 1789, only a few days after the storming of the Bastille, the Marquis Charles de Villette proposed that the new ideal of fraternity could be achieved by common dining in the streets. The rich and poor could be united, and all ranks would mix...the capital, from one end to the other, would be one immense family, and you would see a million poeple all seated at the same table...' And then, standing on its head the ancien regime traditon of the royal family dining au grand couvert, Villette goes on to add: On that day, the nation will hold its grand covert'. Ironically, of course, the proposal would have represented just as much a manipulation of the meal in service of the state as anything ever staged at Versailles. That flirtation with the communal meal as emblematic of a new age of equality and faternity was to continue to ebb and flow through the early, more extreme, years of the Revolution. On 14 July 1790, the first anniversary of the fall of the Bastille, a Festival of Federation was staged, prefaced the previous day by two thousand spectators watching members of the National Assembly share an open-air patriotic meal' in the circus of the Palais Royal...The left-overs from this fraternal repast were distributed to the poor...All of this was to be as dust within a few years, yet what occurred in the priod after 1789 fundamentally shaped developments around the table down to our own day. A primary effect was to dissolve the equation of cuisine and class. Henceforward cuisine of a kind seen as the prerogative of royalty and nobility would be available to anyone who could afford to pay for it."
    ---Feast: A History of Grand Eating, Roy Strong [Harcourt:New York] 2002 (p. 274-6)

    "The French Revolution marks, in its first years, a certain slowing down in the "culinary" evolution of the coutnry...But not for long. Soon the arts of the gourmet and the pleasures of the table reclaimed their prestige; the new leaders of France quickly tired of Spartan virtues. People began to eat well again, not only in Paris, but also in the provinces. Cooks whos masters had emigrated were snapped up. Great houses reorganized. New restaurants were opened. The cuisine of France regained the grandeur it had enjoyed during the reign of Louis XV. However, what with wars and the gory horrors of the Terror, famine raged again for several years. In 1793 and ordinance prohibited more than one pound of meat a week per person...There was no bread and the potato crop was poor. But restrictions are never applied to all-under any regime. And while plain people...were rushed to the guillotine, there were feasting and carousing in the mansions of Barras and Fouche. The following is a menu of a dinner served by Barras in the winter of 1793:

    Soup
    With a little onions, a la ce-devant minime
    Second Course
    Steaks of sturgeon en brochette
    Six Entrees
    Turbot saute a l'homme de confiance
    formerly Maitre-d'hotel
    Cucumber stuffed with marrow
    Vol au vent of chicken breast in Bechemel sauce
    A ci-devant Sait-Pierre sauce with capers
    Fillets of partridge in rings (not to say in a crown)
    Two Roasts
    Gudgeons of the region
    A carp in court-bouillon
    Fifth Course
    Lentils a la ci-devant Reine
    Beets scalded and sauted in butter
    Artichoke bottoms a la ravigote
    Eggs a la neige
    Cream fritters with orange water
    Salad
    Celery en remoulade
    Dessert
    Twenty-four different dishes"

    "The Revolution was not merely political: it also changed many customs of the French people. The four meals (breakfast, lunch, dinner and supper) were reduced to two: breakfast and dinner. The latter was soon the more important of the two."
    ---An Illustrated History of French Cuisine, Christian Guy [Bramhall House:New York] 1962 (p. 95-7)


    About these notes: Food history can be a complicated topic. These notes are not meant to be a comprehensive treatment of the subject, but a summary of salient points supported with culinary evidence. If you need more information we suggest you start by asking your librarian to help you find the books and articles cited in these notes. Article databases are good for locating current recipes, consumer trends, and new products.
    balloon pictureHave questions? Ask!

    About culinary research & about copyright.
    Research conducted by Lynne Olver, editor The Food Timeline. About this site.


    http://www.foodtimeline.org/foodcolonial.html
    © Lynne Olver 2000
    21 October 2007